Electronic evidence must be delivered to multiple parties involved in the legal matter, including opposing counsel, partner firms, requesting government agencies, or others. Depending on the recipients, you may require different delivery formats.

• Ameriwood Industries, Inc. v. Liberman, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93380 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 27, 2006)
• APC Filtration, Inc. v. Becker, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76221 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 12, 2007)
• Benton v. Dlorah, Inc., 2007 WL 2225946 (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2007)
• Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7580 (D. Minn. Feb. 1, 2007)
• Christopher v. Tulsa Ambassador Hotel, L.L.C., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89796 (N.D. Okla. Dec. 11, 2006)
• Claredi Corp. v. SeeBeyond Tech. Corp., 2007 WL 735018 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 8, 2007)
• Cobb v. Dawson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4632 (M.D. Ga. Jan. 22, 2007)
• DE Technologies, Inc. v. Dell, Inc., 2007 WL 128966 (W.D. Va. Jan. 12, 2007)
• In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47943 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2007)
• In re Claims for Vaccine Injuries Resulting in Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2007 WL 1983780 (Fed. Cl. May 25, 2007)

How Fios can Help

Fios can help you understand the benefits and risks of each format in preparation for your 26(f) meet and confer session, produce evidence in a broad spectrum of formats, and help you keep track of what electronic evidence was sent to which recipients and when.

Click here to learn more about our services >